![]() 01/27/2014 at 20:39 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Article !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! .
![]() 01/27/2014 at 20:40 |
|
The HEMI isn't around now, technically speaking ;)
![]() 01/27/2014 at 20:50 |
|
It's carbuzz, don't trust anything by them.
![]() 01/27/2014 at 20:50 |
|
Don't just about all modern gas engines have hemispherical combustion chambers? (LS and LT based motors excluded)
![]() 01/27/2014 at 21:01 |
|
so that means hemisphereical combustion chambers are obsolete now?
![]() 01/27/2014 at 21:19 |
|
Certain geometries are better than pure hemispheres anyway, cardioid pentroof stuff and all sorts of bendy swirly variations. The real point is, any variation on pentroof gets the benefits of the hemispherical combustion chamber anyway, so my Miata is a "hemi," though not a "Hemi," since that is still trademarked by Chrysler.
![]() 01/27/2014 at 21:47 |
|
That's wonderful advertising.
![]() 01/27/2014 at 22:00 |
|
Well, big V8 ones.
![]() 01/28/2014 at 00:44 |
|
In before Chevy doesn't have this problem with the Corvette.
![]() 01/28/2014 at 03:44 |
|
Ummm.... so its really down to customer demand then, as long as SRT buyers don't start wishing for turbocharged four cylinder Challengers then the hemi is safe.
CAFE can be such a lark due to how its implemented, as long as Chrysler sells a bunch of fuel sipping cars and trucks to offset the mileage penalty of the hemi V8 cars and trucks (especially with trucks getting a different formula) then its not a big issue.
![]() 01/28/2014 at 03:48 |
|
The lack of quench seemed to be the biggest issue with the classic hemi combustion chamber something they addressed with the modern "hemi" or well tried to at least.